POS Week 4

 0    12 speciālā zīme    dklekowski
lejupielādēt mp3 Drukāt spēlēt pārbaudiet sevi
 
jautājums English atbilde English
paradigm
sākt mācīties
impressive scientific achievement that it shows the way into new ways of studying reality and reaching for new and more scientific successes
paradigm evolves to include
sākt mācīties
fundamental theories (all scientists agree to); more breakthrough (standard examples of new theories); shared scientific values; shared methodological prescriptions
Normal science - Thomas Kuhn
sākt mācīties
scientists agree what problems they need to tackle, what are the methods of scientific research and which results count as scientifically valid - this is the system and if it works well, we're in the state of normal science
Does anomaly influence the whole paradigm?
sākt mācīties
Normal science upholds certain norms and these are no longer under discussion; when there is an anomaly, scientists try to solve it within the existing paradigm, only if efforts fail, the problem is investigated and it may lead to a scientific revolution
Four elements of a paradigm
sākt mācīties
1. Symbolic generalisations; 2. Exemplars; 3. Scientific values; 4. Methodological prescriptions
Symbolic generalisations
sākt mācīties
allow for theories to be depicted through the use of symbols
Exemplars
sākt mācīties
examples of how to apply a theory
scientific values
sākt mācīties
social-institutional dimension of a paradigm
methodological prescriptions
sākt mācīties
how to observe? What counts as an observation?
Revolutionary science
sākt mācīties
change of paradigms; revolutionary growth of knowledge; taking another picture as guide in solving hitherto unsolved puzzles
Conclusions based on Kuhn
sākt mācīties
1. Truth only exists within paradigms; 2. No independent criterion to choose between paradigms, this allows the idea of relativism; 3. Science is a human activity
Ideal of Positive Science
sākt mācīties
There cannot be a science solely based on observation and logic; Popper says that we can only falsify a theory; Kuhn, Duhem and Quine say that we can neither falsify nor confirm; sacrificing falsifying observation is often a rational thing to do

Lai ievietotu komentāru, jums jāpiesakās.